Archive for the ‘Ohio’ Category

Ohio Tax Man Giveth, then Taketh from Gamblers

July 11th, 2013 1 comment

On June 30, 2013, Ohio Governor John Kasich signed into law Amended Substitute House Bill Number 59. The 3,747 page bill sets forth the Buckeye State’s 2014-15 fiscal year budget.

But that’s not all. Tucked into the bill is the following:

Sec. 5747.01….

As used in this chapter:

(A) “Adjusted gross income” or “Ohio adjusted gross income” means federal adjusted gross income, as defined and used in the Internal Revenue Code, adjusted as provided in this section:

(29) Deduct, to the extent not otherwise deducted or excluded in computing federal or Ohio adjusted gross income for the taxable year, any loss from wagering transactions that is allowed as an itemized deduction under section 165 of the Internal Revenue Code and that the taxpayer deducted in computing federal taxable income.

Gambling losses are no longer deductible as an itemized deduction for purposes of the Ohio income tax, effective immediately.

Gambling losses became deductible under Ohio tax law beginning January 1, 2013, as part of legislation expanding commercial gambling in Ohio.

I located one remark after a brief search for the purpose behind the repeal, in an article quoting a GOP budget fact sheet: “Why should Ohioans subsidize the risky behaviors and bad luck of others?”

I wasn’t fully satisfied, so I kept searching, and found this 2010 Columbus Dispatch op-ed that details the circumstances arising to allowing the deduction in the first place. Legislators have since been convinced otherwise, apparently.

From my reading, the repeal is retroactive. In other words, gambling losses are not deducible in Ohio in 2013 for any part of the tax year.

Ohio rejoins the list of other “bad” gambling states that do not permit gambling losses as an itemized deduction at all for income tax purposes:

  • Connecticut
  • Illinois
  • Indiana
  • Massachusetts
  • Michigan
  • West Virginia
  • Wisconsin

This change in the law does not impact professional gamblers in Ohio, of course. Professionals may deduct gambling losses up to the extent of gambling winnings as a trade or business expense.

Tidal Wave of Attorneys and Tax Crimes

January 18th, 2012 No comments

The curriculum vitae for attorney Leslie W. Jacobs:

  • Former President of the Ohio State Bar Association
  • Former Senior Antitrust Partner at Thompson Hine
  • Harvard Law School

Impressive. His legacy? Anything but. Yesterday, Leslie Jacobs was sentenced to one year and one day in federal prison for making and subscribing false personal income tax returns.

On his 2004 through 2007 personal income tax returns, Jacobs falsely inflated business expenses he incurred while serving as a partner in the Cleveland law firm of Thompson Hine, LLP. As stated in the Department of Justice press release:

Among the deductions that Jacobs improperly took were business expenses for which he was reimbursed by the firm; memberships at clubs, including the Chagrin Valley Hunt Club, the Castalia Trout Club, the Union Club and the Harvard Club, that he knew were not deductible; several meals and entertainment charges at the clubs that were personal in nature, including their son’s wedding rehearsal dinner at the Hunt Club, the florist charge at the club and a Valentine’s Day party at the club, according to court documents.

This story is a disappointing head scratcher. To put all the hard work and accomplishments at risk for what, a lesser tax liability? Can an attorney get so caught up in advising others how to act within the bounds of the law that he recklessly forgets to do the same for himself? Sadly, yes.

It’s a problem within the profession. Last week, former Sullivan and Cromwell partner John O’Brien was sentenced to two years and four months in prison for failing to pay taxes on over $10 million in partnership income earned between 2003 and 2008.

We’re talking about egregious white collar offenses committed by men who presumably charged several hundred dollars an hour for their legal advice. Sickening.

Categories: Department of Justice, Ohio, Tax Fraud Tags:

Back To Work

June 15th, 2011 No comments

Earlier today, Ohio Gov. John Kasich released an agreement he reached with Rock Ohio Caesars, ending a month long dispute between the parties that had resulted in casino construction stoppage.

The gaming giant suspended construction of casinos in Cincinnati and Cleveland in order to protest a tax measure Gov. Kasich sought to include in the state’s budget; namely, the 0.26% Commercial Activity Tax (CAT) imposed on all wagers placed in the casinos, regardless of amounts paid for winning wagers.  This levy on casino revenues would have been the first in the United States not to reduce the tax base by paid winning wagers.  Given the obvious difficulties the casinos would have faced administering the tax, and, more importantly, the unpredictably high tax dollars at stake, I didn’t blame Caesar’s at all for making this move.

If you read the agreement, you’ll realize Caesar’s in part got what it wanted: modification to the CAT formula.  The CAT will be imposed on total wagers less winnings paid.

In my opinion, this result is significant not only for the parties involved, but also the U.S. internet gambling industry as a whole.  Various bills for the legalization of internet gambling are currently being drafted at both the federal and state levels.  Of course, a major selling point to the skeptics of legalization is the amount of tax revenues to be generated.  If Kasich and Caesar’s had agreed to his CAT formula, then I believe it would have been more likely for federal and state legislators to seek a similar internet gambling taxation framework in the form of a deposit tax.

Whether or not Kasich sought to impose the CAT according to his definition simply as a bluff in order to squeeze as many dollars as possible out of Caesar’s, we’ll likely never know.  Indeed, Caesar’s could have taken Kasich to court to challenge the validity of the tax.  Instead, sidelined casino construction workers in Ohio can now get back to work.  I think I can even hear them happily humming along to this classic:


Rock Ohio Caesars Construction Delayed

May 15th, 2011 No comments

Political jostling at its finest.

Last week, the two Rock Ohio Caesars casino construction projects in Cincinnati and Cleveland halted because of a tax battle between the state governor and Caesar’s Entertainment.  The casinos’ projected openings have been delayed from 2012 to 2013.

On November 3, 2009, Ohio Issue 3, also known as the Four Casinos Initiative, was approved by state voters to amend the Ohio Constitution, permitting one brick and mortar casino to operate in each of the state’s four most populous cities, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus and Toledo.  One notable component of Issue 3 is the 33% tax on gross casino revenues.

When on the ballot, Issue 3 was opposed by current Ohio governor John Kaisch, who narrowly defeated incumbent Ted Strickland in the 2010 election.  Strickland was the biggest backer of Issue 3.  Now forced to tangle with Issue 3, Kaisch is demanding for the state to receive an even larger chunk of casino revenues.  One measure that Kaisch introduced to and was subsequently approved by the state’s House has resulted in a casino construction stoppage.

Governor Kaish seeks to impose, in addition to the 33% gross revenue tax, a .26% tax on all casino bets wagered via the state’s commercial activity tax.  As the local ABC affiliate network points out:

So, say someone comes to the casino with a $10 roll of quarters and between winning and losing, winds up putting $100 worth of quarters in the machine but walks away with their original $10.

Even though neither the casino nor the customer made money, the casino would have to pay the tax on the $100 bet.

“You’re taxing money over and over again,” said Roger Gros, publisher of Global Gaming Business magazine. “It really is not going to be very fair to the casinos.”

The commercial activity tax is different from the 33% gross revenue tax, which is imposed on all bets wagered less amounts paid for winning wagers.  All other states with legal gambling levy winnings by the gross revenue tax.  In other words, Kaisch’s introduced measure is unprecedented in the U.S. gaming industry.  And Caesar’s believes the additional tax would far too significantly cut into the casino’s after-tax profits.

Caesar’s publicly stated that the construction hiatus will continue until a resolution between the gaming giant and the state governor is reached. The governor’s budget currently sits in the state’s Senate.  If approved, the casino companies are likely to take the measure to court and argue that the commercial activity tax violates the state constitution.

In the meantime, construction workers remain sidelined indefinitely, and the likely boost to state revenues from Issue 3 will have to wait longer than initially expected.  Anything but “winner winner, chicken dinner” will be heard in the state of Ohio for now, it seems.

Categories: Gambling, Ohio Tags: ,
COMPENSATION DISCLAIMER: Please note that Taxes in the Back has financial relationships with some of the merchants mentioned here. Taxes in the Back may be compensated if consumers choose to utilize the links located throughout the content on this site and generate sales for the said merchant.