Archive

Posts Tagged ‘pokerfuse’

Mailbag: Traveling Away From the “Tax Home”

April 5th, 2012 3 comments

Taxpayer asks:

I have been following your articles on poker tax on Pokerfuse.com. I was wondering if you can clarify for me on the article about traveling expenses. What is the difference between the tax home being a residence and the tax home being the most frequented local casino in terms of deductible traveling expenses? Like if the tax home is the primary residence, then does that mean you can deduct traveling expenses and half of food/entertainment to all the local casinos since that’s traveling away from your tax home? I’m a little unsure of the definition of “traveling away from” the tax home.

For some context, check out the article the taxpayer is referring to here.

Under section 162(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, a taxpayer may deduct ordinary and necessary business expenses incurred in connection with the taxpayer’s trade or business. Travel expenses are deductible under 162(a) if they are the ordinary and necessary expenses of traveling away from the “tax home” for one’s business, profession, or job.

There are two definitions we need to explore: (1) “traveling away from” and (2) “tax home.”

Traveling Away From Home

A taxpayer is traveling away from the tax home if:

  • The duties require the taxpayer to be away from the general area of the tax home substantially longer than an ordinary day’s work; AND
  • The taxpayer needs sleep or rest to meet the demands of the work while away from home.

Keep in mind the rest requirement is not satisfied by merely napping in the car. The taxpayer need not be away from the tax home for a whole day to qualify, however, so long as relief from duty is long enough to get necessary rest.

So a professional gambler who travels away from the tax home to a casino to play in a multiple day poker tournament appears to meet the test. If, however, the pro drives an hour to a casino, plays poker for three hours, and then drives home, the travel expenses incurred for that trip may not be deductible.

Tax Home

In general, the tax home is the taxpayer’s regular place of business. If, however, the taxpayer does not have a regular place of business because of the nature of the work, then the tax home may be where the taxpayer regularly lives.

Ultimately, ascertaining the “tax home,” if any, depends on the particular facts and circumstances. If one does not have a regular or main place of business, IRS Publication 463 says to apply the following three factors to evaluate whether the tax home is where the taxpayer regularly lives:

  1. You perform part of your business in the area of your main home and use that home for lodging while doing business in the area.
  2. You have living expenses at your main home that you duplicate because your business requires you to be away from that home.
  3. You have not abandoned the area in which both your historical place of lodging and your claimed main home are located; you have a member or members of your family living at your main home; or you often use that home for lodging.

The publication states if all three factors are met, the tax home is the home where one regularly lives. If only two factors are met, it depends on all the facts and circumstances. If only one factor is met, the taxpayer is considered an itinerant and cannot deduct travel expenses.

A professional gambler may or may not meet all three factors.

On the one hand, a pro may do business at home by studying the game and reading instructional material, duplicate living expenses by frequently paying for overnight lodging when traveling throughout the country to play poker, and return to the residence often during the year. Under those facts, it seems likely the pro meets all three factors.

On the other hand, a pro may not have a primary residence at all. Instead, he may stay in one city for three months, another city for four, and a third city for five; he sometimes stays on friend’s couches, other times stays at hotels or at casinos. This pro almost certainly would be considered an itinerant.

Then we have all of the in-between cases. Each taxpayer’s situation is different. A prudent move is to consult a tax professional to see how your particular facts and circumstances apply.

U.S Tax Implications of Black Friday

March 9th, 2012 No comments

This week at pokerfuse I discuss some U.S. tax implications of Black Friday.

In short, it’s a mess.

pokerfuse: Taxation of Gambling Series

February 10th, 2012 No comments

I’m running an exclusive weekly series at the independent online poker news blog pokerfuse. The plan is to walk through poker-related U.S. tax issues until this year’s Tax Day, April 17.

The first post was published this past Wednesday. I discuss recordkeeping for gambling activity and offer a definition for the gambling “session.”

Categories: Gambling Tags:
COMPENSATION DISCLAIMER: Please note that Taxes in the Back has financial relationships with some of the merchants mentioned here. Taxes in the Back may be compensated if consumers choose to utilize the links located throughout the content on this site and generate sales for the said merchant.